Information on the Computer-Based GED Test

In 2014, the GED Testing Service, the only official keeper of the GED test in the United States, a division of the American Council on Education, converted the official GED test to a computer-based version for the first time. However, its important to realize that computer-based is not the same thing as online. GED Testing Service states that the test is no longer an endpoint for adults, but rather a springboard for further education, training, and better-paying jobs. The latest version of the test has four assessments: Literacy (reading and writing)MathematicsScienceSocial Studies The scoring system provides a profile of scores that includes a students strengths and areas of needed improvement for each of the four assessments. This scoring system gives non-traditional students the opportunity to demonstrate job and college readiness through an endorsement that can be added to the GED credential. How the Change Came About For several years, the GED Testing Service worked closely with many different education and career experts while making the changes it sought. Some of the groups involved in the research and decisions: High schoolsTwo- and four-year colleges and universitiesEmployersNational Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM)National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE)Adult educators from around the countryNational Center for Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc.Educational Policy Improvement Center at University of OregonEducation Division of ACTInstitute for Education Leadership and Policy Its easy to see that a high-level of research went into the changes in the 2014 GED test. The assessment targets are based on the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in Texas and Virginia, as well as career-readiness and college-readiness standards. All of the changes are based on evidence of effectiveness. The bottom line, the GED Testing Service states, is that a GED test-passer must remain competitive with students who complete their high school credentials in the traditional manner. Computers Offer Variety in Testing Methods The switch to computer-based testing allowed the GED Testing Service to incorporate different testing methods not possible with paper and pencil. For example, the Literacy Test includes text ranging from 400 to 900 words, and 6 to 8 questions in a variety of formats, including: Multiple choice itemsBrief short answer itemsSeveral different types of technology-enhanced itemsCloze items embedded in passages (multiple response options that appear in a drop-down menu)One 45-minute extended response item Other opportunities provided by computer-based testing are the ability to include graphics with hot spots, or sensors, a test-taker can click on to provide answers to a question, drag-and-drop items, and split screens so the student can page through longer texts while keeping an essay on the screen. Resources and Study Help The GED Testing Service provides documents and webinars to educators across the country to prepare them for administering the GED test. Students have access to programs designed not only to prepare them for the test but to help them excel at it. There is also a transition network that supports and links adults with postsecondary education, training, and career opportunities, providing them a chance to earn a sustainable living wage. Whats On the Computer-Based GED Test? The computer-based GED test from GED Testing Service developed in 2014 had four parts: Reasoning Through Language Arts (RLA) (150 minutes)Mathematical Reasoning (90 minutes)Science (90 minutes)Social Studies (90 minutes) Its worth repeating that while students take the test on a computer, the test is not an online test. You must take the test at an official GED testing facility. You can find the testing centers for your location via state-by-state listing of adult education websites. There are seven types of test items on the exam: Drag-and-dropDrop-downFill-in-the-blankHot spotMultiple choice (4 options)Extended response (Found in RLA and Social Studies. Students read and analyze a document and write a response using evidence from the document.)Short answer (Found in RLA and Science. Students write a summary or conclusion after reading a text.) Sample questions are available on the GED Testing Service site. The test is available in English and Spanish, and you can take each part up to three times in a one-year period.

Tracing Changes in Pythagoras Speech in Ovids...

Tracing Changes in Pythagoras Speech in Ovids Metamorphoses Change in Ovid, as well as in life, seems to be the only constant. Change is the subject of the Metamorphoses and Ovids purpose in recounting myths is established from the very beginning: My intention is to tell of bodies changed to different forms... with a poem that runs from the worlds beginning to our own days (1.1-4). From this foundation, Ovid launches into his stories, using metamorphosis more as a vehicle for telling his stories than as an actual subject matter. Although he retells religious myths, Ovid is not writing a religious manuscript. Rather, the product is a work of literature. Ovid is conscious that he is writing literature, not religion, and†¦show more content†¦By contrast, Ovids motives in narrating myths in the Metamorphoses are rarely ulterior. Most myths are free of the religious implications and the moralistic nuances that his Greek predecessors used as the backbone of their plays and poems. Instead, Ovid chooses to entertain his readership by his brilliant language and delight them with not only absorbing tales, but also with his masterful talent of weaving narratives together. Let us not be overzealous and label Ovid as an entertainer, for his themes and purpose change as quickly as the stories he narrates. Rather, it is safer to say that Ovid relieves his audience of any ulterior religious or moral meaning. Pythagoras, on the other hand, inveighs against his audience to refrain from meat eating, in some cases comparing them to cannibals like Thyestes and the Cyclops. Pythagoras neglects to give a reason for not eating meat, waiting almost a hundred lines to explain that the spirit comes and goes, is housed wherever it wills, shifts residence from beasts to men, from men to beasts (15.171-173). Our souls, Pythagoras claims, are deathless... when they leave our bodies, they find new dwelling-places (15.162-164). Pythagoras asserts that the spirit, or soul, is the same in men and animals since man can be reincarnated into beast and vice versa; therefore, eating an animal is equivalent to cannibalism. A contemporary of Pythagoras, Xenophanes, mocked this belief in the

Spinoza free essay sample

# 8217 ; s Ethical motives, Part I Proposition 33 Essay, Research Paper Baruch Spinoza believes the kernel of God includes God # 8217 ; s being and discusses the causality of God through his ontological work, Ethical motives. In Ethical motives, Spinoza is seeking a method of truth through the perfect being. The kernel of what that perfect being expresses, utilizing this method of truth, is God ( i.e. the perfect being ) . In this essay I am traveling to give a elaborate history of Part I, Proposition 33 of Spinoza # 8217 ; s book Ethical motives. Part I, Proposition 33 of Ethical motives provinces that # 8220 ; things could non hold been produced by any other manner or in any other order than is the case. # 8221 ; This means that whatever does be could non be in any other manner or in any other mode so it already exists. It surely follows so, harmonizing to Spinoza that this proposition 33 follows from Proposition 16 and 29. Proposition 16 provinces that, # 8221 ; From the necessity of the godly nature there must follow infinite things in infinite ways [ modis ] , ( that is, everything that can come within the range of infinite mind ) . We will write a custom essay sample on Spinoza or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page # 8221 ; Proposition 29 provinces that, # 8220 ; Nothing in nature is contingent, but all things are from the necessity of the godly nature determined to be and to move in a definite way. # 8221 ; Harmonizing to Spinoza, this provides cogent evidence that all things have needfully followed from the nature of God ( Proposition 16 ) and have been determined to be and to move in a definite manner from the necessity of that nature ( Proposition 29 ) . For illustration this means that I smoke coffin nails from the necessity of God # 8217 ; s will, and moreover coffin nails, a cancer-causing agent, exist from God # 8217 ; s will. I will now speak about Spinoza # 8217 ; s farther conditions of Proposition 33. In Note 1, Spinoza is developing that there can non be a eventuality or possibility of a thing bing because it either needfully exists or is impossible for it to be. Spinoza believes that everything has a cause. If it has no cause it contributes to the theory of uncertainty doing a thing contingent. This deficiency of knowing, which makes a thing contingent is a contradiction, and since all that we know is or isn # 8217 ; T in existe nce. This means that there can non be any eventuality of or about anything. For illustration, this means that it is possible for me to smoke without a ground. Spinoza responds to this unfavorable judgment that our thought of eventuality is made up of our deficiency of cognition or more blatantly our ain ignorance about the being of that thing ( i.e. we do non cognize the cause ) . In Note 2, Spinoza reiterates from his cogent evidence that a thing can non be anything different so that which it is. Spinoza is careful to show that a thing is either perfect or imperfect, and they are merely the manner they are needfully. It follows from that, if a thing was different from what it is already, God # 8217 ; s will would hold made that thing the manner it is and no other manner needfully. Spinoza responds to G.W. Leibniz # 8217 ; s thought of the best of all possible universes. Spinoza points out that there is an absurdness in Leibniz # 8217 ; s thought. Spinoza could state, How is it possible for God to make the best of all possible universes when God is the Universe? If God could hold created multiple universes it would intend that at that place would hold been two or more Supreme beings in being. Obviously it could non be possible for there to be two or more Supreme beings since God is the Universe. Hence there are non two or more Supreme beings in being and a thing can be no different so what that thing already is in its entireness. Furthermore, God # 8217 ; s will and essence cause a thing and that makes the thing true to God. Furthermore, if a thing is a perfect or imperfect ( good or bad ) thing it is that manner already and no idea to what could hold been will do any difference. It is what it is. In decision, I have explained Proposition 33 and Note 1 and 2 of Part I of Spinoza # 8217 ; s Ethical motives. This essay shows that God created everything and that everything is the manner it is because of the nature of God to will it. Furthermore, God is everything and all causes follow from God. Spinoza, Baruch Part I Proposition 33 of Ethical motives. Cited in Modern Philosophy: Anthology of Primary Beginnings. Edited by: Ariew, Roger and Watkins, Eric. Hackett ( Indianapolis/Cambridge 1998 ) . Pg. 143. Ariew and Watkins. Pg. 137. Ariew and Watkins. Pg. 141.